EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊
Quick Search Issue Search Advanced Search
Volume 56 Issue 8
Aug.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
Yuan Xinyi, Chen Ju, Tian Qiang. Research on constraints violation in dynamics of multibody systems based on SE(3). Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(8): 2351-2363. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-24-022
Citation: Yuan Xinyi, Chen Ju, Tian Qiang. Research on constraints violation in dynamics of multibody systems based on SE(3). Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(8): 2351-2363. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-24-022
shu

RESEARCH ON CONSTRAINTS VIOLATION IN DYNAMICS OF MULTIBODY SYSTEMS BASED ON SE(3)

  • School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

  • Received Date: January 07, 2024
  • Accepted Date: February 21, 2024
  • Available Online: February 21, 2024
  • Published Date: February 22, 2024
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • When simulating the dynamics of muti-rigid body systems, the Index-1 differential-algebraic equations (DAEs) only consider the acceleration constraint equations and ignore the position and velocity constraint equations. During the numerical integration procedure, the constraints violation at position and velocity levels increase, leading to unreliability of numerical results. Accordingly, constraint stabilization methods have to be introduced to reduce the violation of the constraints. In this work, the dynamic equations of muti-rigid body systems on SE(3) are offered based on the Hamilton’s principle. Then four constraint stabilization methods on SE(3) are introduced: the Baumgarte stabilization method, the penalty method, the augmented Lagrangian formulation and the constraint violation stabilization upgraded method. Compared with the traditional dynamic equations of muti-rigid body systems, the dynamic equations on SE(3) solved by integration scheme consider the coupling of rotations and transitions, leading more accurate configuration results and calculation of constraint error. The accurate calculation of constraint error improves the performance of the constraint stabilization methods on SE(3). The four kinds of constraint stabilization methods on SE(3) with dynamic equations of muti-rigid body systems are respectively simulated by RKMK (Runge-Kutta Munthe-Kass) integration scheme. Finally, two numerical examples, including a spatial double pendulum with spherical hinges and a crank slider mechanism with cylindrical hinges, are presented. The numerical results related to constraints violation at position and velocity levels, conservation of the total energy and simulation time are compared and analyzed. It is concluded that the four constraint stabilization methods on SE(3) are effective for preserving structure and energy conservation where RKMK is employed to simulate the dynamic equations of muti-rigid body systems. Compared with the other three constraint stabilization methods on SE(3), the augmented Lagrangian formulation method on SE(3) can provide better numerical accuracy and smaller constraints violation at both position and velocity levels. The Baumgarte stabilization method on SE(3) can balance the calculation efficiency and numerical accuracy well.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (34)
  • [1]
    Diebel J. Representing attitude: Euler angles, unit quaternions, and rotation vectors. Matrix, 2006, 58(15-16): 1-35
    [2]
    Udwadia FE, Schutte AD. An alternative derivation of the quaternion equations of motion for rigid-body rotational dynamics. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2010, 77(4): 044505
    [3]
    黄子恒. 基于李群的多体系统动力学建模与计算. [硕士论文]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2021 (Huang Ziheng. Dynamic modeling and computation of multibody systems based on Lie group. [Master Thesis]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2021 (in Chinese)

    Huang Ziheng. Dynamic modeling and computation of multibody systems based on Lie group. [Master Thesis]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2021 (in Chinese)
    [4]
    Munthe-Kaas H. Lie-butcher theory for Runge-Kutta methods. BIT Numerical Mathematics, 1995, 35: 572-587 doi: 10.1007/BF01739828
    [5]
    Munthe-Kaas H. High order Runge-Kutta methods on manifolds. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 1999, 29(1): 115-127 doi: 10.1016/S0168-9274(98)00030-0
    [6]
    Zenzerović I. Numerical modelling of dynamics of multibody systems in Lie-group setting. [Master Thesis]. Zagreb: University of Zagreb, 2012
    [7]
    Chen J, Huang Z, Tian Q. A multisymplectic Lie algebra variational integrator for flexible multibody dynamics on the special Euclidean group SE(3). Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2022, 174: 104918 doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2022.104918
    [8]
    黄子恒, 陈菊, 张志娟等. 多刚体动力学仿真的李群变分积分算法. 动力学与控制学报, 2022, 20(1): 8-17 (Huang Z, Chen J, Zhang Z. Lie group variational integration for multi-rigid body system dynamics simulation. Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2022, 20(1): 8-17 (in Chinese)

    Huang Z, Chen J, Zhang Z. Lie group variational integration for multi-rigid body system dynamics simulation. Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2022, 20(1): 8-17 (in Chinese)
    [9]
    Brüls O, Cardona A, Arnold M. Lie group generalized-α time integration of constrained flexible multibody systems. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2012, 48: 121-137 doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.07.017
    [10]
    Leitz T, de Almagro RTSM, Leyendecker S. Multisymplectic Galerkin Lie group variational integrators for geometrically exact beam dynamics based on unit dual quaternion interpolation-no shear locking. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 374: 113475 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113475
    [11]
    Hante S, Tumiotto D, Arnold M. A Lie group variational integration approach to the full discretization of a constrained geometrically exact Cosserat beam model. Multibody System Dynamics, 2022, 54(1): 97-123 doi: 10.1007/s11044-021-09807-8
    [12]
    顾崴, 刘铖, 安志朋等. 一种基于Hamel形式的无条件稳定动力学积分算法. 力学学报, 2022, 54(9): 2577-2587 (Gu Wei, Liu Cheng, An Zhipeng, et al. An unconditionally stable dynamical integration algorithm based on Hamel’s formalism. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(9): 2577-2587 (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-131

    Gu Wei, Liu Cheng, An Zhipeng, et al. An unconditionally stable dynamical integration algorithm based on Hamel’s formalism. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(9): 2577-2587 (in Chinese) doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-131
    [13]
    Marques F, Souto AP, Flores P. On the constraints violation in forward dynamics of multibody systems. Multibody System Dynamics, 2017, 39: 385-419 doi: 10.1007/s11044-016-9530-y
    [14]
    Nikravesh PE. Some methods for dynamic analysis of constrained mechanical systems: A survey//Computer Aided Analysis and Optimization of Mechanical System Dynamics. Springer, 1984: 351-368
    [15]
    Pappalardo CM, Lettieri A, Guida D. Stability analysis of rigid multibody mechanical systems with holonomic and nonholonomic constraints. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2020, 90: 1961-2005 doi: 10.1007/s00419-020-01706-2
    [16]
    Wehage KT, Wehage RA, Ravani B. Generalized coordinate partitioning for complex mechanisms based on kinematic substructuring. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2015, 92: 464-483 doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.06.006
    [17]
    Neto MA, Ambrósio J. Stabilization methods for the integration of DAE in the presence of redundant constraints. Multibody System Dynamics, 2003, 10: 81-105 doi: 10.1023/A:1024567523268
    [18]
    Fisette P, Vaneghem B. Numerical integration of multibody system dynamic equations using the coordinate partitioning method in an implicit Newmark scheme. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1996, 135(1-2): 85-105 doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(95)00926-4
    [19]
    Baumgarte J. Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1972, 1(1): 1-16 doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(72)90018-7
    [20]
    Baumgarte JW. A new method of stabilization for holonomic constraints. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1983, 50: 869-870 doi: 10.1115/1.3167159
    [21]
    De Jalón JG, Bayo E. Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-time Challenge. New York: Springer, 2012
    [22]
    Bayo E, Ledesma R. Augmented Lagrangian and mass-orthogonal projection methods for constrained multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, 1996, 9: 113-130 doi: 10.1007/BF01833296
    [23]
    Braun DJ, Goldfarb M. Eliminating constraint drift in the numerical simulation of constrained dynamical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 198(37-40): 3151-3160 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.05.013
    [24]
    Gear CW, Leimkuhler B, Gupta GK. Automatic integration of Euler-Lagrange equations with constraints. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 1985, 12: 77-90
    [25]
    Kinon PL, Betsch P, Schneider S. The GGL variational principle for constrained mechanical systems. Multibody System Dynamics, 2023, 57(3-4): 211-236 doi: 10.1007/s11044-023-09889-6
    [26]
    Kinon PL, Betsch P, Schneider S. Structure-preserving integrators based on a new variational principle for constrained mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2023, 111: 14231-14261 doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-08522-7
    [27]
    Bauchau OA. The finite element method in time for multibody dynamics//International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Boston, 2023
    [28]
    Manara S, Gabiccini M, Artoni A, et al. On the integration of singularity-free representations of SO(3) for direct optimal control. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 90: 1223-1241 doi: 10.1007/s11071-017-3722-8
    [29]
    Fotland G, Haugen B. Numerical integration algorithms and constraint formulations for an ALE-ANCF cable element. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2022, 170: 104659 doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104659
    [30]
    Blajer W. Methods for constraint violation suppression in the numerical simulation of constrained multibody systems—A comparative study. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 200(13-16): 1568-1576 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.007
    [31]
    Müller A, Terze Z. On the choice of configuration space for numerical Lie group integration of constrained rigid body systems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2014, 262: 3-13 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2013.10.039
    [32]
    Holm DD. Geometric Mechanics-Part II: Rotating, Translating and Rolling. World Scientific, 2011
    [33]
    Sonneville V. A geometric local frame approach for flexible multibody systems. [PhD Thesis]. Belgium: Université de Liège, 2015
    [34]
    Lee T. Computational geometric mechanics and control of rigid bodies. [PhD Thesis]. Michigan: University of Michigan, 2008
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]Zhang Zhe, Dai Honghua, Feng Haoyang, Wang Xuechuan, Yue Xiaokui. EFFICIENT NUMERICAL METHOD FOR ORBIT DYNAMIC FUNCTIONS WITH INITIAL VALUE AND TWO-POINT BOUNDARY-VALUE CONSTRAINTS[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(2): 503-516. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-336
    [2]Kai Long, Xuan Wang, Liang Ji. INDEPENDENT CONTINUOUS MAPPING METHOD FOR STRESS CONSTRAINT[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2019, 51(2): 620-629. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-169
    [3]Ma Xiuteng, Zhai Yanbo, Xie Shouyong. HHT METHOD WITH CONSTRAINTS VIOLATION CORRECTION IN THE INDEX 2 EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR MULTIBODY SYSTEMS[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(1): 175-181. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-16-275
    [4]Dongting Wang J.-Z. Hong Tanhui Wu. Additional contact constraint method in impact stage of planar flexible multi-body dynamics[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2011, 43(6): 1157-1161. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2011-6-lxxb2011-016
    [5]Qi Zhaohui Fang Huiqing. Study on redundant constraints in multibody systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2011, 43(2): 390-399. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2011-2-lxxb2009-596
    [6]Gao Tong Zhang Weihong Pierre Duysinx. Topology optimization of structures designed with multiphase materials: volume constraint or mass constraint?[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2011, 43(2): 296-305. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2011-2-lxxb2010-303
    [7]Jianhua Rong, Xiaojuan Xing, Guo Deng. A structural topological optimization method with variable displacement constraint limits[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2009, 41(3): 431-439. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2009-3-2007-418
    [8]Qi Zhaohui. Recursive method for modeling flexible multibody systems with non-ideal constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2008, 40(5): 684-694. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2008-5-2007-577
    [9]Yunkang Sui, Hongling Ye, Xirong Peng, Xuesheng Zhang. The ICM method for continuum structural topology optimization with condensation of stress constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2007, 23(4): 554-563. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2007-4-2006-043
    [10]A NEW VIOLATION CORRECTION METHOD FOR CONSTRAINT MULTIBODY SYSTEMS 1)[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1998, 30(3): 300-306. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-1998-3-1995-130

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (155) PDF downloads (86) Cited by()
    Related

    Download Center

    Author Center

    Copyright © Editorial Office of the Chinese Journal of Mechanics   京ICP备05039218号-1

    Address：15 Beishihuan Xi Lu, Haidian District, Beijing, China   China Pos：100190

    Tel：010-62536271

    Email：lxxb@cstam.org.cn

    微信公众号
    RSS

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return