EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊
Li Jingchuan, Liang Lihong, Liu Xiaoming, Ma Hansong, Song Jingru, Wei Yueguang. Experimental investigations of strength, toughness and failure mechanism of the metal/epoxy/metal adhesive system. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(6): 1213-1222. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-17-321
Citation: Li Jingchuan, Liang Lihong, Liu Xiaoming, Ma Hansong, Song Jingru, Wei Yueguang. Experimental investigations of strength, toughness and failure mechanism of the metal/epoxy/metal adhesive system. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(6): 1213-1222. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-17-321

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF STRENGTH, TOUGHNESS AND FAILURE MECHANISM OF THE METAL/EPOXY/METAL ADHESIVE SYSTEM

  • Received Date: September 21, 2017
  • Accepted Date: October 26, 2017
  • Available Online: October 26, 2017
  • In the present research, we carry out a systematical experimental investigations on the strength, toughness and failure mechanism of the metal/epoxy/metal adhesive system. For the case of the aluminum alloy cylinder/epoxy/aluminum alloy cylinder adhesive system, we measure the tensile deformation and failure behaviors, including the dependence of the failure loading on the adhesive layer thickness and adhesive interfacial inclined angle. Through introducing a series of definitions, such as average normal stress, average shear stress, average normal strain and average shear strain, along the adhesive interface, we realize the measurements on interfacial failure strength, and obtain the relationship between the interfacial strength and the interfacial adhesive angle as well as adhesive layer thickness, and we further obtain the failure strength surface, adhesive interfacial fracture energy, as well as the energy release rate for the binding system of the aluminum alloy/epoxy adhesive/aluminum alloy. The obtained results provide a scientific basis for deeply understanding the strength and toughness properties as well as the failure mechanism of the metal adhesive system, and have an important guiding for the optimization design and property evolution of the metal adhesive system. Through present systematic research and analysis, we come to the following conclusions: The tensile failure of the aluminum alloy/epoxy/aluminum alloy adhesive system globally displays the brittle-elastically failure behavior. Failure mode is the fracture along the adhesive interface of adhesive layer. Both failure strength and interfacial fracture energy display the strong size effect when adhesive layer thickness is at hundred micron level. Interfacial adhesive strength increases obviously as adhesive thickness decreases. At critical state the average normal stress and average shear stress are approximately situated at a same circle on the strength failure surface. The interfacial fracture energy decreases obviously as adhesive layer thickness decreases. Both interfacial failure strength and interfacial fracture energy are closely depended on the interfacial adhesive angle.
  • [1]
    Kinloch AJ. Adhesion and Adhesives: Science and Technology. London: Chapman and Hall, 1987
    [2]
    Wu ZS, Yuan H, Niu HD. Stress transfer and fracture propagation in different kinds of adhesive joints. Journal of Engineering Mechanics-ASCE, 2002, 128: 562-573
    [3]
    Dai JG, Ueda T, Sato Y. Development of the nonlinear bond stress-slip model of fiber reinforced plastics sheet-concrete interfaces with a simple method. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2005, 9: 52-62
    [4]
    Ascione F. Mechanical behavior of FRP adhesive joints: A theoretical model. Composites Part B:Engineering, 2009, 40: 116-24
    [5]
    Grant LDR, Adams RD, da Silva LFM. Experimental and numerical analysis of single-lap joints for the automotive industry. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29: 405-13
    [6]
    Grant LDR, Adams RD, da Silva LFM. Effect of the temperature on the strength of adhesively bonded single lap and T joints for the automotive industry. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29: 535-42
    [7]
    Loureiro AL, da Silva LFM, Sato C, Figueiredo MAV. Comparison of the Mechanical Behavior Between Stiff and Flexible Adhesive Joints for the Automotive Industry. The Journal of Adhesion, 2010, 86: 765-87
    [8]
    Higgins A. Adhesive bonding of aircraft structures. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2000, 20: 367-76
    [9]
    Kahraman R, Sunar M, Yilbas B. Influence of adhesive thickness and filler content on the mechanical performance of aluminum single-lap joints bonded with aluminum powder filled epoxy adhesive. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 205: 183-9
    [10]
    Afendi M, Teramoto T, Bakri HB. Strength prediction of epoxy adhesively bonded scarf joints of dissimilar adherends. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2011, 31(6): 402-411
    [11]
    Afendi M, Majid MSA, Daud R, et al. Strength prediction and reliability of brittle epoxy adhesively bonded dissimilar joint. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2013, 45(2): 21-31
    [12]
    da Silva LFM, Carbas RJC, Critchlow GW, et al. Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29: 621-32
    [13]
    Reis PNB, Soares JRL, Pereira AM, et al. Effect of adherends and environment on static and transverse impact response of adhesive lap joints. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2015, 80: 79-86
    [14]
    Wang CH, Rose LRF. Determination of triaxial stresses in bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1997, 17: 17-25
    [15]
    Imanaka M, Fujinami A, Suzuki Y. Fracture and yield behavior of adhesively bonded joints under triaxial stress conditions. Journal of Materials Science, 2000, 35: 2481-91
    [16]
    Arcan L, Arcan M, Daniel I. SEM fractography of pure and mixed mode inter-laminar fracture in graphite/epoxy composites. ASTM Technologies, 1987, 948: 41-67
    [17]
    Stamoulis G, Carrere N, Cognard JY, et al. Investigating the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded metallic joints using the Arcan fixture. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2016, 66: 147-159
    [18]
    Choupani N. Mixed-mode cohesive fracture of adhesive joints: Experimental and numerical studies. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(15): 4363-4382
    [19]
    Choupani N. Interfacial mixed-mode fracture characterization of adhesively bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2008, 28(6): 267-282
    [20]
    Nakano H, Sekiguchi Y, Sawa T. FEM stress analysis and strength prediction of scarf adhesive joints under static bending moments. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2013, 44: 166-73
    [21]
    Liao L, Sawa T, Huang C. Numerical analysis on load-bearing capacity and damage of double scarf adhesive joints subjected to combined loadings of tension and bending. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2014, 53(18): 65-71
    [22]
    Kim MK, Elder DJ, Wang CH, et al. Interaction of laminate damage and adhesive disbonding in composite scarf joints subjected to combined in-plane loading and impact. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(3): 945-953
    [23]
    Jen YM. Fatigue life evaluation of adhesively bonded scarf joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 36(1): 30-39
    [24]
    Zhan Z, Meng Q, Hu W, et al. Continuum damage mechanics based approach to study the effects of the scarf angle, surface friction and clamping force over the fatigue life of scarf bolted joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 2017, 102: 59-78
    [25]
    Nakano H, Omiya Y, Sekiguchi Y, et al. Three-dimensional FEM stress analysis and strength prediction of scarf adhesive joints with similar adherends subjected to static tensile loadings. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2014, 54(5): 40-50
    [26]
    Gacoin A, Lestriez P, Assih J, et al. Comparison between experimental and numerical study of the adhesively bonded scarf joint and double scarf joint: Influence of internal singularity created by geometry of the double scarf joint on the damage evolution. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2009, 29: 572-579
    [27]
    Bendemra H, Compston P, Crothers PJ. Optimisation study of tapered scarf and stepped-lap joints in composite repair patches. Composite Structures, 2015, 130: 1-8
    [28]
    Suzuki Y. Adhesive Tensile strengths of scarf and butt joints of steel plates : 2nd Report, Relation between Mechanical Properties of Adhesive and Fracture Criteria of Joints. Bulletin of JSME, 1985, 28(463): 2575-2584
    [29]
    Suzuki Y. Adhesive tensile strengths of scarf and butt joints of steel plates (relation between adhesive layer thicknesses and adhesive strengths of joints): Solid-mechanics, strength of materials. Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu A Hen/transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Part A, 1987, 53(487): 514-522
    [30]
    Chaudhuri RA, Sou-Hsiung JC. Three-dimensional asymptotic stress field in the vicinity of an adhesively bonded scarf joint interface. Composite Structures, 2009, 89(3): 475-483
    [31]
    Chiu SHJ, Chaudhuri RA. A three-dimensional eigenfunction expansion approach for singular stress field near an adhesively-bonded scarf joint interface in a rigidly-encased plate. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2011, 78(10): 2220-2234
    [32]
    Groth HL. Prediction of failure loads of adhesive joints using the singular intensity factors. Fracture Mechanics:Eighteenth Symposium:ASTM STP, 1988, 945: 278-84
    [33]
    许巍, 陈力, 张钱城等. 粘结界面力学行为及其表征. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2012, 42(12): 1361-1376 (Xu Wei, Chen Li, Zhang Qiancheng, et al. Mechanical behavior and characterization of bonding interface. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2012, 42(12): 1361-1376 (in Chinese)
    [34]
    张军, 贾宏. 内聚力模型的形状对胶接结构断裂过程的影响. 力学学报, 2016, 48(5): 1088-1095 (Zhang Jun, Jia Hong. Influence of cohesive zone models shape on adhesively bonded joints. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2016, 48(5): 1088-1095 (in Chinese)
    [35]
    李慧, 张鹏, 程永奇等. 金属表面预处理对金属/聚合物界面粘结强度的影响. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2013, 4: 51-54 (Li Hui, Zhang Peng, Cheng Yongqi, et al. Research effects of metal pretreatment on the bonding strength of metal/polymer interface. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2013, 4: 51-54 (in Chinese)
    [36]
    王询, 林建平, 万海浪. 铝合金表面特性对其胶接性能影响的研究进展. 材料工程, 2017, 45(8): 123-131 (Wang Xun, Lin Jianping, Wan Hailang. Research progress in effect of aluminum surface properties on adhesively bonded performance. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2017, 45(8): 123-131 (in Chinese)
    [37]
    Yang S, Xu W, Liang LH, et al. An experimental study on the dependence of the strength of adhesively bonded joints with thickness and mechanical properties of the adhesives. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2014, 28: 1055-71
    [38]
    Wei Y, Zhao H. Peeling experiments of ductile thin films along ceramic substrates-critical assessment of analytical models. International Journal of Solids&Structures, 2008, 45(13): 3779-3792
  • Related Articles

    [1]Jia Fei, Yang Chengpeng, Song Yuanxiang. REVIEW ON STRENGTH FAILURE CRITERIA OF ANISOTROPIC COMPOSITE MATERIALS[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(4): 1006-1024. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-23-507
    [2]Zhu Zhongmeng, Yang Zhuoran, Jiang Han. REVIEW OF INTERFACIAL DEBONDING BEHAVIOR OF ADHESIVE STRUCTURES WITH SOFT MATERIALS[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(7): 1807-1828. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-131
    [3]Wang Shuai, Yao Yin, Yang Yazheng, Chen Shaohua. SIZE EFFECT OF THE INTERFACE ENERGY DENSITY IN BI-NANO-SCALED-METALLIC PLATES[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(5): 978-984. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-17-142
    [4]Xuemin Ye, Chunxi Li, Songlin Wang. Hydrodynamic stability of a liquid wavy film with interfacial shear[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2009, 41(3): 307-312. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2009-3-2007-594
    [5]Fulin Shang, Takayuki Kitamura. Molecular dynamics simulations of interfacial crack nucleation and propagation[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2007, 39(4): 571-576. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2007-4-2006-199
    [6]Weihong Zhang, Gaoming Dai, Fengwen Wang, Shiping Sun, Hicham Bassir. Topology optimization of material microstructures using strain energy-based prediction of effective elastic properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2007, 39(1): 77-89. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2007-1-2006-086
    [7]Failure theory and reliability analysis of structural system considering static strength and fatigue[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2005, 37(5): 662-666. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-2005-5-2004-531
    [8]PATH SELECTION AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF INTERFACIAL FRACTURE[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1997, 29(3): 355-358. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-1997-3-1995-237
    [9]AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF FRACTURE MECHANICS FOR CRACK TIP NORMAL TO INTERFACIAL[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1997, 29(2): 242-247. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-1997-2-1995-222
    [10]FISSION OF INTERFACIAL SOLITARY WAVES IN A TWO-LAYER FLUID SYSTEM[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1990, 22(2): 139-145. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-1990-2-1995-924
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 杜辉,叶志宏. 发动机多层橡胶粘接结构超声波图像缺陷识别. 粘接. 2021(01): 187-191 .
    2. 杨怡,黄炽辉,吴作栋. 基于双剪实验的CFRP-钢板界面粘结性能研究. 中山大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(06): 62-70 .
    3. 邢红梅. 结构胶粘接厚度对建筑幕墙抗形变能力影响分析. 化学与粘合. 2020(04): 299-303 .
    4. 张乐,张广成,任联锋,陈正平,蔡璟璟. 航天器电子产品用环氧胶粘剂粘接工艺研究. 中国胶粘剂. 2019(09): 24-29 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1111) PDF downloads (459) Cited by(6)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return