EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊
Guo Wei, Liu Jiazheng, Zhang Xiaowei, Teng Bailu, Kang Lixia, Gao Jinliang, Liu Yuyang, Luo Wanjing. Study on the mechanism of drawdown management of shale gas horizontal well considering creep effect. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(3): 630-642. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-460
Citation: Guo Wei, Liu Jiazheng, Zhang Xiaowei, Teng Bailu, Kang Lixia, Gao Jinliang, Liu Yuyang, Luo Wanjing. Study on the mechanism of drawdown management of shale gas horizontal well considering creep effect. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(3): 630-642. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-460

STUDY ON THE MECHANISM OF DRAWDOWN MANAGEMENT OF SHALE GAS HORIZONTAL WELL CONSIDERING CREEP EFFECT

  • Received Date: September 27, 2022
  • Accepted Date: February 12, 2023
  • Available Online: February 13, 2023
  • Considering the characteristics of shale reservoirs such as the low matrix permeability and complex natural fracture development, shale gas is mainly developed by multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells. The production of shale gas wells adopts the two modes: pressure relief production and pressure control production. Currently, scholars generally believe that pressure control production can improve the EUR of shale gas wells, and stress sensitivity is the main reason why the effect of pressure relief production is worse than that of the pressure control production. In this study, besides the stress sensitivity of matrix and fracture, the creep effect of matrix is also considered, and embedded discrete fracture models under the influence of creep are established. The results show that pressure relief production is better than pressure control production when only stress sensitivity is considered, and pressure control production is better than pressure relief production only when creep effect is considered. In addition, inhibiting the creep effect of shale is one of the mechanisms of improving the EUR of shale gas wells through pressure control production. With the increase of pressure control time, the gas well EUR shows a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, and there is an optimal value for pressure control production; The larger the matrix creep parameter, the higher the conductivity of the artificial fracture, the smaller the matrix permeability, the smaller the adsorption volume, and the better the effect of pressure control on gas production This study explains the production increase mechanism through pressure control production, laying a foundation for the optimization of shale gas well production system.
  • [1]
    赵辉, 谢鹏飞, 曹琳等. 基于井间连通性的油藏开发生产优化方法. 石油学报, 2017, 38(5): 555-561 (Zhao Hui, Xie Pengfei, Cao Lin, et al. Reservoir production optimization method based on inter-well connectivity. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(5): 555-561 (in Chinese)
    [2]
    姚军, 李志豪, 孙海. 基于代理辅助分层粒子群算法的页岩气藏压裂参数优化. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4): 12-19

    Yao Jun, Li Zhihao, Sun Hai. Optimization of fracturing parameters for shale gas reservoir based on a surrogate-assisted hierarchical particle swarm optimization algorithm. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2020, 44(4): 12-19 (in Chinese))
    [3]
    Michael A, Gupta I. A comparative study of oriented perforating and fracture initiation in seven shale gas plays. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 88: 103801 doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103801
    [4]
    Almasoodi M, Vaidya R, Reza Z. Drawdown-management and fracture-spacing optimization in the Meramec Formation: numerical- and economics-based approach. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engneering, 2020, 23(4): 1251-1264
    [5]
    贾爱林, 位云生, 刘成等. 页岩气压裂水平井控压生产动态预测模型及其应用. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 71-80 (Jia Ailin, Wei Yunsheng, Liu Cheng, et al. A dynamic prediction model of pressure control production performance of shale gas fractured horizontal wells and its application. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 71-80 (in Chinese)
    [6]
    邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二). 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2): 166-178 (Zou Caineng, Dong Dazhong, Wang Yuman, et al. Shale gas in China: characteristics, challenges and prospects (II). Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2): 166-178 (in Chinese)
    [7]
    Philippe E, Wang HY, Matteo MP, et al. Production pressure-drawdown management for fractured horizontal shale gas wells. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2017, 69(11): 60, 62, 68
    [8]
    Wang H. What factors control shale-gas production and production-decline trend in fractured systems: A comprehensive analysis and investigation. SPE Journal, 2017, 22: 562-581 doi: 10.2118/179967-PA
    [9]
    Li C, Wang J, Xie H. Anisotropic creep characteristics and mechanism of shale under elevated deviatoric stress. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 185: 106670 doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106670
    [10]
    Sone H, Zoback MD. Time-dependent deformation of shale gas reservoir rocks and its long-term effect on the in situ state of stress. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2014, 69: 120-132 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.04.002
    [11]
    王永岩, 孙慢, 郭鹏等. 软岩相似模型的蠕变特性及数值模拟试验研究. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(10): 125-129 (Wang Yongyan, Sun Man, Guo Peng, et al. Experimental study on numerical simulation of creep characteristics for soft rock of similar model. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(10): 125-129 (in Chinese)
    [12]
    Mighani S, Taneja S, Sondergeld, CH, et al. Nanoindentation Creep Measurements on Shale//49th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, California, June 2015
    [13]
    唐建新, 腾俊洋, 张闯等. 层状含水页岩蠕变特性试验研究. 岩土力学, 2018, 39: 33-41 (Tang Jianxin, Teng Junyang, Zhang Chuang, et al. Experimental study of creep characteristics of layered water bearing shale. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39: 33-41 (in Chinese)
    [14]
    Haghighat E, Rassouli FS, Zoback MD, et al. A viscoplastic model of creep in shale. Geophysics, 2020, 85(3): 155-166
    [15]
    Zhang Q, Fink R, Krooss B, et al. Reduction of shale permeability by temperature-induced creep. SPE Journal, 2021, 26(2): 750-764
    [16]
    Zhang J, Zhu D, Hill AD. Water-induced damage to propped-fracture conductivity in shale formations. SPE Production & Operation, 2016, 31: 147-156
    [17]
    Dudley JW, Myers MT, Shew RD, et al. Measuring compaction and compressibilities in unconsolidated reservoir materials by time-scaling Creep. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 1998, 1: 430-437
    [18]
    Cai J, Xia Y, Lu C, et al. Creeping microstructure and fractal permeability model of natural gas hydrate reservoir. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 115: 104282 doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104282
    [19]
    Schatz JF, Carroll MV. Creep compaction of porous rock//ISRM International Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, September 1981
    [20]
    Kallesten E, Andersen P, Berawala DS, et al. Modeling of permeability and strain evolution in chemical creep compaction experiments with fractured and unfractured chalk cores conducted at reservoir conditions. SPE Journal, 2020, 25: 2710-2728 doi: 10.2118/197371-PA
    [21]
    An C, Killough J, Xia X. Investigating the effects of stress creep and effective stress coefficient on stress-dependent permeability measurements of shale rock. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 198: 108155 doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108155
    [22]
    Xu YF, Sergio DACFJ, Yu W, et al. Discrete-fracture modeling of complex hydraulic-fracture geometries in reservoir simulators. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2017, 20(2): 403-422
    [23]
    Mirani A, Marongiu-Porcu M, Wang H, et al. Production pressure drawdown management for fractured horizontal wells in shale-gas Formations. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2018, 21(3): 550-565
    [24]
    Teng B, Li H, Yu H. A novel analytical fracture permeability model dependent on both fracture width and proppant-pack properties. SPE Journal, 2020, 25(6): 3031-3050 doi: 10.2118/201093-PA
    [25]
    Pang Y, Soliman MY, Deng H, et al. Analysis of effective porosity and effective permeability in shale-gas reservoirs with consideration of gas adsorption and stress effects. SPE Journal. 2017, 22(6): 1739-1759
    [26]
    Li SB, Zhang DX, Li X. A new approach to the modeling of hydraulic-fracturing treatments in naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Journal, 2017, 22 (4): 1064-1081
    [27]
    McKee CR, Bumb AC, Koenig RA. Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal and other geologic formations. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1988, 3(1): 81-91
    [28]
    Reyes L, Osisanya SO. Empirical correlation of effective stress dependent shale rock properties//Canadian International Petroleum Conference. OnePetro, 2000
    [29]
    Teng BL, Luo WJ, Chen Z, et al. A comprehensive study of the effect of Brinkman flow on the performance of hydraulically fractured wells. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 213: 110355 doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110355
    [30]
    李江, 陈先超, 高平等. 考虑应力敏感效应的裂缝性碳酸盐岩气井拟稳态产能预测方法. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(3): 111-116 (Li Jiang, Chen Xianchao, Gao Ping, et al. A pseudo-steady-state productivity prediction method for fractured carbonate gas wells considering stress-sensitivity effects. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(3): 111-116 (in Chinese) doi: 10.11911/syztjs.2021032
    [31]
    李虹, 于海洋, 杨海烽等. 裂缝性非均质致密储层自适应应力敏感性研究. 石油钻探技术, 2022, 50(3): 99-105 (Li Hong, Yu Haiyang, Yang Haifeng, et al. Adaptive stress sensitivity study of fractured heterogeneous tight reservoir. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(3): 99-105 (in Chinese)
    [32]
    Guo J, Liu Y. Modeling of proppant embedment: elastic deformation and creep deformation//SPE International Production and Operations Conference & Exhibition. OnePetro, 2012
    [33]
    韩大匡. 油藏数值模拟基础. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993

    Han Dakuang. Fundamentals of Reservoir Numerical Simulation. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1993 (in Chinese))
    [34]
    Bumb AC, McKee CR. Gas-well testing in the presence of desorption for coalbed methane and devonian shale. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1988, 3(1): 179-185 doi: 10.2118/15227-PA
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 刘东博,陈力. 基于模糊逻辑的双臂空间机器人在轨辅助对接操作变结构力/位控制. 机械工程学报. 2025(01): 60-70 .
    2. 徐玉龙,王学林,张磊,王鹏,陈昊,赵立德,肖千. 基于干扰观测器的欠驱动手指滑模控制. 齐鲁工业大学学报. 2023(02): 1-7 .
    3. 宋涛涛,李艳萍,李洪港,韩春雪. 基于改进变结构趋近律的机械臂滑模控制系统. 计算机与现代化. 2023(12): 14-18 .
    4. 洪梦情,丁萌,顾秀涛,郭毓. 双臂空间机器人的固定时间轨迹跟踪控制. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2022(06): 1168-1174 .
    5. 汤万兴,艾海平,陈力. 漂浮基空间机器人固定时间收敛主动容错控制. 福州大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(05): 650-657 .

    Other cited types(3)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (576) PDF downloads (100) Cited by(8)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return