EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊
Cai Shupeng, Wang Zhineng, Duan Chuanwei, Li Dan. DRAG CHARACTERISTICS OF A DRAG-REDUCING SURFACTANT SOLUTION FLOWING OVER A SUDDEN-EXPANSION PIPE[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2018, 50(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-17-328
Citation: Cai Shupeng, Wang Zhineng, Duan Chuanwei, Li Dan. DRAG CHARACTERISTICS OF A DRAG-REDUCING SURFACTANT SOLUTION FLOWING OVER A SUDDEN-EXPANSION PIPE[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2018, 50(2): 274-283. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-17-328

DRAG CHARACTERISTICS OF A DRAG-REDUCING SURFACTANT SOLUTION FLOWING OVER A SUDDEN-EXPANSION PIPE

  • Received Date: September 27, 2017
  • The minor loss characteristics of a drag-reducing surfactant solution flowing over a circular sudden-expanded pipe have been investigated experimentally with an expansion ratio of 1:1.52. The surfactant used is cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) with concentrations of 1×10 - 4 and 2×10-4 by weight. The maximum drag reduction rate for both solutions is achieved 70% in the fully developed flow in straight pipes. But at lower inlet Reynolds numbers than the critical one, the expansion loss coefficient is only 10%~20% below that for water, while at inlet Reynolds numbers much higher than the critical one, it is found to be much greater than that for water and to approach 1.5 times one for water at the Reynolds number at which the friction factor reaches that for water. Furthermore, a much longer distance is required for the micelle solution flowing across the sudden-expanded step, than 7.8 times the diameter (45 times the step height) of expansion-downstream pipe for water in order to reform a fully developed flow in the downstream. And as inlet flow for the solution of concentration 2 ×10-4 loses its drag-reducing efficiency, approximately 158 times diameter (920 times the step height) of the expansion downstream pipe is necessary for reforming the fully developed drag-reducing flow in the downstream. From the present rheological measuring results for the surfactant solutions, the drag and its development behaviour of the sudden expansion pipe can be considered to be closely related to the time characteristics in forming and relaxing of the netlike micelle structure induced by shearing.
  • [1] 吴应湘,林黎明,钟兴福. 带有新型涡激振动抑制罩的圆柱体的水动力特性. 力学学报,2016, 48(2): 307-317
    [1] (Wu Yingxiang, Lin Liming, Zhong Xingfu.Investigation in hydrodynamics of a circular cylinder with the new suppressing shroud for vortex-induced vibration.Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2016, 48(2): 307-317 (in Chinese))
    [2] 宋磊建,付世晓. 剪切流下发生涡激振动的柔性立管阻力特性研究. 力学学报,2016, 48(5): 300-306
    [2] (Song Leijian, Fu Shixiao.Investigation of drag forces for flexible risers undergoing vortex-induced vibration in shear flow.Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2016, 48(5): 300-306 (in Chinese))
    [3] 苏建,田海平,姜楠. 逆向涡对超疏水壁面减阻影响的TRPIV实验研究. 力学学报,2016, 48(5): 1033-1039
    [3] (Su Jian, Tian Haiping, Jiang Nan.TRPIV experimental investigation of the effect of retrograde vortex on drag-reducing mechanism over hyperhydropholic surfaces.Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2016, 48(5): 1033-1039 (in Chinese))
    [4] Nowak M.Time-dependent drag-reducing and ageing in aqueous solution of a cationic surfactant. Experiments in the Fluids, 2003, 34(2): 397-402
    [5] 佐伯隆, 徳原慶二.抵抗低減効果による流体輸送の省エネルギー技術の開発と普及. 日本レオロジー学会誌, 2015, 42(5): 279-284
    [5] (Saeki K, Tokuhara K.Development and spread of energy saving technology for fluid transportation by using drag-reducing effect. Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi, 2015, 42(5): 279-284 (in Japanese))
    [6] Matras Z, Kopiczak B.Intensification of drag reduction effect by simultaneous addition of surfactant and high molecular polymer into the solvent.Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2015, 96(2): 35-42
    [7] Gasljevic K, Hoyer K, Matthys EF.Intentional mechanical degradation for heat transfer recovery in flow of drag-reducing surfactant solutions.Experi ental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2017, 84(6): 251-265
    [8] Andrew M, Lucas W, Prathamesh K, et al.Heat transfer enhancement in turbulent drag reducing surfactant solutions by agitated heat exchangers.Int. Heat Mass Transfer, 2017, 109: 1044-1051
    [9] Li FC, Yasuo K, Bo Y, et al.Experimental study of drag-reducing mechanism for a dilute surfactant solution.International of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008, 51(7): 835-843
    [10] Yuli SI, Usui H, Suzuki H.Hydrodynamics and heat transfer characteristics drag-reducing trimethylolethane solution and suspention by cationic surfactant.Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 2006, 39(6): 623-632
    [11] 蔡书鹏,罗斌文,彭高. 氯化钠对添加剂水溶液低雷诺数减阻效果的影响. 机械工程学报, 2016, 52(24): 164-169
    [11] (Cai Shupeng, Luo Binwen, Peng Gao.Influence of NaCl on the drag-reducing effects in low reynolds number water flow with additive drag reducers. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 52(24): 164-169 (in Chinese))
    [12] Cai SP, Higuchi Y.Drag-reducing behavior of an unusual non-ionic surface in a circle pipe turbulent flow.Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26(3): 400-406
    [13] Tamano S, Morinishi Y, Taga K.Drag reduction and degradation of nonionic surfactant solutions with organic acid in turbulent pipe flow.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 215: 1-7
    [14] Cai SP, Hizuki H, Komoda Y.Drag-reduction of a nonionic surfactant aqueous solution and its rheological characteristics.Science China Technological Sciences, 2012, 42(4): 388-394
    [15] Wei JJ, Kawaguchi Y, Li FC, et al.Drag-reducing and heat transfer of a novel zwitterionic surfactant solution.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009, 52(3): 3547-3554
    [16] Li FC, Kawaguchi Y, Segawa T.Reynolds-number dependence of turbulence structures in a drag-reducing surfactant solution channel flow investigated by particle image velocimetry.Physics of Fluid, 2005, 17: 075104-075109
    [17] Kawaguchi Y, Sagawa T, Feng ZP.Experimental study on drag-reducing channel flow with surfactant additives-spatial structure of the turbulence investigated by PIV.International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2004, 23(5): 700-709
    [18] Wei JJ, Wang JF, Zhang CW, et al.Combined effects of temperature and Reynolds number on drag-reducing characteristics of a cationic surfactant solution.The Canadian Jorunal of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 90(5): 1304-1309
    [19] Zhang Y, Qi YY, Schmidt J, et al.Unusual temperature gap in drag reduction of cationic surfactants with mixed conterions.Rheol Acta, 2017, 56(5): 409-414
    [20] Yu B, Kawaguchi Y. Segawa T.Parametric study of surfactant-induced drag-reduction by DNS. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2006, 27(5): 887-894
    [21] Fu ZG, Iwaki Y, Motozawa M, et al.Characteristic turbulent structure of a modified drag-reduced surfactant flow via dosing water from channel wall. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2015, 53: 135-145
    [22] Pak B, Cho YI, Choi SUS.Turbulent hydrodynamic behavior of a drag-reducing viscoelastic fluid in a sudden-expansion pipe.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 39: 353-373
    [23] Poole RJ, Alves MA, Oliveira PJ, et al.Plane sudden expansion flows of Viscoelastic liquids.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 146: 79-91
    [24] dales C, Escudier MP, Poole RJ. Asymmetry of the turbulent flow of a viscoelastic liquid through an axisymmetric.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 125: 61-70
    [25] Poole RJ, Escudier MP.Turbulent flow of a viscoelastic liquid through an axisymmetric sudden expansion.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 117: 25-46
    [26] Dhinakaran S, Oliveria MSN, Pinho FT, et al.Steady flow of power-law fluids in 1:3 planar sudden expansion.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 198(1): 48-58
    [27] Tamaddon-Jahromi HR, Loperz-Aguilar IJ, Webster MF.Predicting large experimental excess pressure drops for Boger fluids in contraction-expansion flow.Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 230: 43-47
    [28] Norouzi M, Shahbani Zahiri A, Shahmardan MM, et al.A numerical study on pressure losses in asymmetric viscoelastic flow through symmetric planar gradual expansions.European Journal of Mechanics, B/Fluids, 2017, 65: 199-212
    [29] 今尾茂樹, 小里泰章,田中敏ら. 界面活性剤水溶液の急拡大のながれ. 日本機械学会論文集. B編, 2001, 67(658): 1319-1324
    [29] (Imao S, Kozato Y, Tanaka T.Flow of drag-reducing surfactant solution though a sudden expansion pipe. JSME, B, 2001, 67(658): 1319-1324 (in Japanese))
    [30] Li PW, Kawaguchi Y, Yabe A.Transitional heat transfer and turbulent characteristics of drag-reducing flow through a contracted channel. Journal of Enhanced Heat Transfer, 2001, 8(1): 23-40
    [31] 焦利芳,董泳,苏文涛等. 表面活性剂溶液在不规则管件内的湍流减阻特性. 节能技术,2009,153(1): 7-14
    [31] (Jiao Lifang, Dong Yong, Su Wentao, et al.Turbulent drag reduction characteristics of surfactant solution in irregular tubing units. Energy Conservation Technology, 2009, 153(1): 7-14 (in Chinese))
    [32] Alcoutlabi M, Baek SG, Magda JJ, et al.A comparison of three different methods for measuring both normal stress differences of viscoelastic liquids in torsional rheometers.Rheol Acta, 2009, 48(2): 191-200
    [33] Ohlendorf D, Interthal W, Hoffmann H.Surfactant systems for drag reduction: Physico-chemical properties and rheological behavior.Rheol Acta, 1986, 25: 468-486
    [34] Suzuki H, Fuller G, Usui H.Development characteristics of drag-reducing surfactant solution flow in a duct.Rheol Acta, 2004, 43: 232-239
    [35] Hu YT, Mattys EF.Characterization of micellar structure dynamics for a drag-reducing cationic surfactant solution under shear: Normal stress studies and flow geometry effects.Rheol Acta, 1995, 34: 450-460
    [36] Hu YT, Wang SQ.Kinetic studies of a shear thickening micellar solution.Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1993, 156(1): 31-37
    [37] Bae Y, Kim YI.Prediction of local pressure drop for turbulent flow in axisymmtric sudden expansion with chamfered edge.Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2014, 92(2): 229-239
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 刘浩,谢络,姚博仁,孙孟舸,胡海豹. 高分子-自抛光漆复合涂层减阻特性实验研究. 力学学报. 2023(06): 1228-1235 . 本站查看
    2. 石若冉,张浩,张志,李茂林. 突扩管中高分子聚合物溶液湍流减阻的数值模拟. 山东建筑大学学报. 2023(06): 31-38 .
    3. 陈丽,徐太平,李栓,丁小惠. 清洁减阻驱油压裂液在致密油藏新井压裂上的应用. 精细与专用化学品. 2022(06): 23-27 .
    4. 张志,张浩,石若冉,李茂林. 表面活性剂减阻及传热研究进展. 区域供热. 2022(05): 150-158 .
    5. 杨松默,王刚,曹延林,黄忠意,段慧玲,吕鹏宇. 水下多级微结构液气界面的稳定性和可恢复性研究. 力学学报. 2020(02): 451-461 . 本站查看
    6. 彭绍府,蔡书鹏. 洞塞对表面活性剂减阻管流阻力特性的影响. 湖南工业大学学报. 2020(06): 22-26 .
    7. 王侃宏,张悦,刘欢,乔华. 减阻剂对变截面管流动阻力特性的研究. 煤炭与化工. 2019(02): 121-125+134 .
    8. 魏进家,刘飞,刘冬洁. 减阻用表面活性剂溶液分子动力学模拟研究进展. 力学学报. 2019(04): 971-990 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(7)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1296) PDF downloads (404) Cited by(15)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return