核电结构土-结相互作用分析分区混合计算方法

陈少林; 郭琪超; 周国良

doi:10.6052/0459-1879-19-271

核电结构土-结相互作用分析分区混合计算方法

doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-19-271

陈少林^*†2), ,,
郭琪超^*,
周国良^†

^* 南京航空航天大学土木与机场工程系,南京 210016
^? 环境保护部核与辐射安全中心,北京 100101

基金项目: 1) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51978337)

详细信息

通讯作者:
陈少林

中图分类号: O342
计量
- 文章访问数: 1161
- HTML全文浏览量: 228
- PDF下载量: 116
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-09-30
- 刊出日期: 2020-02-10

PARTITIONED HYBRID METHOD FOR SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR POWER STRUCTURE

Chen Shaolin^{*†2)
, ,},
Guo Qichao^*,
Zhou Guoliang^†

^* Department of Civil Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China
^? Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center of Ministry of Environmental Protection,Beijing 100101,China

摘要

摘要: 土-结构相互作用分析是核电结构进行抗震设计和安全评估的重要环节.在核电结构的土-结相互作用分析中,阻尼和非线性是影响结构反应的重要因素. 若采用频域分析,可以方便考虑阻尼,但需通过等效线性化来考虑非线性,不适合于强震作用下的土体非线性.若采用时域分析的逐步积分方法,适合于考虑非线性,但材料阻尼一般采用瑞利阻尼模型,除了紧靠指定阻尼比的少数几个振型外,其他振型的反应将受到瑞利阻尼模型所确定的大阻尼所抑制,造成地震反应与真实情形有较大差异.若采用时域分析的模态叠加法,可合理计入阻尼效应,但模态叠加法不能考虑非线性.因此,如何合理考虑阻尼和非线性是核电结构土-结相互作用分析需要关注的问题.基于此,本文提出一种模态叠加和时步积分结合的土-结相互作用分区算法.其中,出于安全性考虑,地震作用下核电主体结构一般不允许进入非线性,因此结构可采用模态叠加方法,以便合理考虑结构阻尼;土体和基础采用显式时步积分法,可考虑土体非线性;通过人工边界条件考虑无限域的影响 (辐射阻尼).通过简单算例对该方法进行了验证,并用于CAP1400核电结构的土-结相互作用分析中,对比分析了采用模态阻尼和瑞利阻尼时核电结构和场地反应的差异,结果表明结构阻尼模型对场地的反应影响不大,但对结构反应影响明显,在实际工程中应合理选取阻尼模型.
- 土-结相互作用 /
- 分区混合算法 /
- 模态阻尼 /
- 瑞利阻尼 /
- 人工边界
Abstract: Soil-structure interaction analysis is an important step in seismic design and safety assessment of nuclear power structures. Material damping and non-linearity are important factors affecting the structural response in the analysis of soil-structure dynamic interaction of nuclear power structures. If the frequency-domain method is used, the damping can be easily considered, but the equivalent linearization is needed to consider the non-linearity, which is not suitable for strong earthquakes, The time-step integration method is suitable for considering non-linearity, but Rayleigh damping model is generally used for material damping. Except for a few modes with specified damping ratio, the response of other modes will be restrained by the large damping determined by Rayleigh damping model, which makes the seismic response quite different from the real situation. If the modal superposition method is used, the damping effect can be reasonably taken into account, but the non-linearity can not be taken into account in the modal superposition method. Therefore, how to reasonably consider the damping and non-linearity is an important issue in the soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear power structures. Considering that the main structure of nuclear power plant is rigid, and it is not easy to enter the non-linearity under earthquake, a new method for soil-structure interaction analysis is proposed in this paper. The modal superposition method is used to structure analysis, and the soil and foundation is analyzed by the explicit time-step integration method, the influence of infinite domain (radiation damping) is considered through artificial boundary conditions. This partitioned algorithm of soil-structure interaction based on modal superposition and time-step integration is realized, and verified by a simple example. Then, the soil-structure interaction analysis of a CAP1400 nuclear power structure is conducted, with the modal damping and Rayleigh damping are adopted respectively. The difference between modal damping and Rayleigh damping on the structure and site response is compared and analyzed. The results show that the structural damping model has little effect on the site response, but has obvious effect on the structure response.
- soil-structure interaction /
- partitioned hybrid method /
- modal damping /
- rayleigh damping /
- artificial boundary condition

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]	Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structure. ASCE standard, ASCE/SEI4-16
[2]	Liao ZP, Wong HL . A transmitting boundary for the numerical simulation of elastic wave propagation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1984,3:174-183
[3]	刘晶波, 李彬 . 三维黏弹性静-动力统一人工边界. 中国科学: 工程科学材料科学, 2005,35(9):966-980
[3]	( Liu Jingbo, Li Bin . 3D viscoelastic static-dynamic unified artificial boundary. Chinese Science: Engineering Science Materials Science, 2005,35(9):966-980 (in Chinese))
[4]	谷音, 刘晶波, 杜义欣 . 三维一致黏弹性人工界及等效黏弹性边界单元. 工程力学, 2007,24(12):31-37
[4]	( Gu Yin, Liu Jingbo, Du Yixin . 3D consistent viscous-spring artificial boundary and viscous-spring boundary element. Engineering Mechanics, 2007,24(12):31-37 (in Chinese))
[5]	章小龙, 李小军, 陈国兴等. 黏弹性人工边界等效载荷算的改进方法. 力学学报, 2016,48(5):1126-1135
[5]	( Zhang Xiaolong, Li Xiaojun, Chen Guoxing , et al. An improved method for calculating equivalent load of viscoelastic artificial boundary. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2016,48(5):1126-1135 (in Chinese))
[6]	Kausel E . Damping matrices revisited. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014,140(8):04014055
[7]	Luco JE . A note on classical damping matrices. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2008,37(4):615-626
[8]	Chopra AK , McKenna F. Modeling viscous damping in nonlinear response history analysis of buildings for earthquake excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2016,45:193-211
[9]	Luco JE, Lanzi A . Optimal Caughey series representation of classical damping matrices. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017,92:253-265
[10]	Hall JF . Problems encountered from the use (or misues) of Rayleigh damping. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2006,35:525-545
[11]	黄宗明, 白绍良, 赖明 . 结构地震反应时程分析中阻尼问题评述. 地震工程与工程振动, 1996,16(2):95-105
[11]	( Huang Zongming, Bai Shaoling, Lai Ming . Review of damping problems in time-history analysis of structural seismic response. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1996,16(2):95-105 (in Chinese))
[12]	淡丹辉, 孙利民 . 结构动力有限元分析的阻尼建模及评价. 振动与冲击, 2007,26(2):121-124
[12]	( Tan Danhui, Sun Limin . Damping modeling and evaluation for dynamic finite element analysis of structures. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2007,26(2):121-124 (in Chinese))
[13]	楼梦麟, 张静 . 大跨度拱桥地震反应分析中阻尼模型的讨论. 振动与冲击, 2009,28(5):22-26
[13]	( Lou Menglin, Zhang Jing . Discussion on damping models for seismic response analysis of long-span. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2009,28(5):22-26 (in Chinese))
[14]	李田 . 结构时程动力分析中的阻尼取值研究. 土木工程学报, 1997,30(3):68-73
[14]	( Li Tian . Study on damping value in time-history dynamic analysis of structures. China Civil Engineering Journal, 1997,30(3):68-73 (in Chinese))
[15]	杨志勇, 李桂清, 瞿伟廉 . 结构阻尼的发展及其研究近况. 武汉工业大学学报, 2000,22(3):38-41
[15]	( Yang Zhiyong, Li Guiqing, Qu Weilian . Development of structural damping and recent research. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2000,22(3):38-41 (in Chinese))
[16]	邹德高, 徐斌, 孔宪京 . 瑞利阻尼系数确定方法对高土石坝地震反应的影响研究. 岩土力学, 2011,32(3):797-803
[16]	( Zou Degao, Xu Bin, Kong Xianjing . Study of influence of different methods for calculating Rayleigh damping coefficient on high earth-rock dam seismic response. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2011,32(3):797-803 (in Chinese))
[17]	李小军, 侯春林, 潘蓉等. 阻尼矩阵选取对核电厂结构地震响应的影响研究. 振动与冲击, 2015,34(1):110-116
[17]	( Li Xiaojun, Hou Chunlin, Pan Rong , et al. Effect analysis of damping matrix on seismic response of nuclear power plant structure. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015,34(1):110-116 (in Chinese))
[18]	Ostadan F, Deng N . Computer Program: SASSI2010-A System for Analysis of Soil-Structure Interaction. Version1.1. Geotechnical and Hydraulic Engineering Services. Bechtel National Inc., San Francisco, California, 2011
[19]	Bolisetti C, Whittaker AS, Mason HB , et al. Equivalent linear and nonlinear site response analysis for design and risk assessment of safety-related nuclear structures. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014,275(8):107-121
[20]	Coleman JL, Bolisetti C, Whittaker AS . Time-domain soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear facilities. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2016,298:264-270
[21]	Jeremic B, Jie G, Preisig M , et al. Time domain simulation of soil-foundation-structure interaction in non-uniform soils. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2009,38(5):699-718
[22]	Kabanda J, Kwon OS, Kwon G . Time and frequency domain analyses of the Hualien large-scale seismic test. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2015,295:261-275
[23]	陈少林, 唐敢, 刘启方等. 三维土-结构动力相作用的一种时域直接分析方法. 地震工程与工程动, 2010,30(2):24-31
[23]	( Chen Shaolin, Tang Gang, Liu Qifang , et al. A direct time-domain method for analysis of three-dimensional soil-structure dynamic interaction. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2010,30(2):24-31 (in Chinese))
[24]	陈少林, 王俊泉, 刘启方等. 基于显-隐式格式的三维时域土-结相互作用分析的异步并行算法. 中国科学:技术科学, 2017,47(12):1321-1330
[24]	( Chen Shaolin, Wang Junquan, Liu Qifang , et al. Asynchronous parallel algorithm for three-dimensional soil-structure interaction analysis based on explicit-implicit integration scheme. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2017,47(12):1321-1330 (in Chinese))
[25]	Leger P, Ide IM, Paultre P . Multiple support seismic analysis of large structures. Computers & Structures, 1990,36(6):1153-1158
[26]	胡聿贤 . 地震工程学. 第2版. 北京: 地震出版社, 2006
[26]	( Hu Yixian . Seismic Engineering. Second Edition. Beijing: Seismological Press, 2006 (in Chinese))
[27]	周国良, 李小军, 刘必灯等. 大质量法在多点激励分析中的应用、误差分析及改进. 工程力学, 2011,28(1):48-54
[27]	( Zhou Guoliang, Li Xiaojun, Liu Bideng , et al. Error analysis and improvements of large mass method used in multi-support seismic excitation analysis. Engineering Mechanics, 2011,28(1):48-54 (in Chinese))
[28]	陈少林, 朱学江, 赵宇昕等. 考虑土骨架非线性的饱和土-结构相互作用分析. 地震工程与工程振动, 2019,39(1):114-127
[28]	( Chen Shaolin, Zhu Xuejiang, Zhao Yuxin , et al. Analysis of saturated soil-structure interaction considering nonlinearity of soil skeleton. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2019,39(1):114-127 (in Chinese))
[29]	陈少林, 赵宇昕 . 一种三维饱和土-基础-结构动力相互作用分析方法. 力学学报, 2016,48(6):1362-1371
[29]	( Chen Shaolin, Zhao Yuxin . A method for three-dimensional saturated soil-foundation-structure dynamic interaction analysis. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2016,48(6):1362-1371 (in Chinese))
[30]	Wolf JP . Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction. Prentice-Hall,Inc, 1985