EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

磁场力及膜曲率对磁敏感薄膜-基底界面 黏附性能的影响与调控

韩明杰 彭志龙 姚寅 张博 陈少华

韩明杰, 彭志龙, 姚寅, 张博, 陈少华. 磁场力及膜曲率对磁敏感薄膜-基底界面 黏附性能的影响与调控[J]. 力学学报, 2021, 53(6): 1609-1621. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-091
引用本文: 韩明杰, 彭志龙, 姚寅, 张博, 陈少华. 磁场力及膜曲率对磁敏感薄膜-基底界面 黏附性能的影响与调控[J]. 力学学报, 2021, 53(6): 1609-1621. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-091
Han Mingjie, Peng Zhilong, Yao Yin, Zhang Bo, Chen Shaohua. INFLUENCE AND REGULATION OF INTERFACIAL ADHESION PROPERTIES OF A MAGNETIC SENSITIVE FILM/SUBSTRATE BY MAGNETIC FORCE AND FILM'S CURVATURE[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(6): 1609-1621. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-091
Citation: Han Mingjie, Peng Zhilong, Yao Yin, Zhang Bo, Chen Shaohua. INFLUENCE AND REGULATION OF INTERFACIAL ADHESION PROPERTIES OF A MAGNETIC SENSITIVE FILM/SUBSTRATE BY MAGNETIC FORCE AND FILM'S CURVATURE[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2021, 53(6): 1609-1621. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-091

磁场力及膜曲率对磁敏感薄膜-基底界面 黏附性能的影响与调控

doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-091
基金项目: 1)国家自然科学基金(12022211);国家自然科学基金(11872114);国家自然科学基金(12032004);北京市自然科学基金(3212011)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    3)陈少华, 教授, 主要研究方向: 仿生材料与结构力学、表面/界面力学、微纳米力学. E-mail: shchen@bit.edu.cn
    2)彭志龙, 教授, 主要研究方向: 仿生材料力学、表面/界面力学. E-mail: pengzhilong@bit.edu.cn;

    通讯作者:

    彭志龙

    陈少华

  • 中图分类号: O341

INFLUENCE AND REGULATION OF INTERFACIAL ADHESION PROPERTIES OF A MAGNETIC SENSITIVE FILM/SUBSTRATE BY MAGNETIC FORCE AND FILM'S CURVATURE

  • 摘要: 界面黏附和脱黏的可调控在攀爬装置、黏附开关、机械抓手等方面具有重要的应用需求. 针对磁敏感薄膜-基底界面, 开展了薄膜初始曲率及外加磁场对界面黏附性能影响机制的研究. 首先实验制备了具有初始曲率的磁敏感薄膜, 分别开展了具有初始曲率的磁敏感薄膜-基底界面撕脱实验及理论研究, 研究了薄膜初始曲率、弯曲刚度和外加磁场强度对界面黏附性能的影响规律. 实验和理论结果一致表明: 具有初始曲率的磁敏感薄膜-基底界面黏附力随薄膜初始曲率的增大而减小, 而外加磁场能够有效提高界面黏附力;相比于初始零曲率薄膜-基底界面稳态撕脱力与薄膜弯曲刚度无关, 薄膜弯曲刚度减弱了具有初始曲率薄膜-基底界面的稳态撕脱力. 进一步从能量角度分析了界面等效黏附性能, 揭示了薄膜弯曲能、磁场势能、界面黏附能的相互竞争机制. 最后, 基于本文的实验及理论结果, 提出了一种磁场和薄膜初始曲率协同调控的简易机械抓手, 可连续实现物体的拾取、搬运和释放功能. 本文结果不仅有助于理解多场调控的界面可逆黏附机制, 对界面黏附可控的功能器件设计亦提供了一种新方法.

     

  • [1] 冯家兴, 胡海豹, 卢丙举 等. 超疏水沟槽表面通气减阻实验研究. 力学学报, 2020, 52(1): 24-30

    (Feng Jiaxing, Hu Haibao, Lu Bingju, et al. Experimental study on drag reduction characteristics of superhydrophobic groove surfaces with ventilation. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2020, 52(1): 24-30 (in Chinese))
    [2] 杨松默, 王刚, 曹延林 等. 水下多级微结构液气界面的稳定性和可恢复性研究. 力学学报, 2020, 52(2): 451-461

    (Yang Songmo, Wang Gang, Cao Yanlin, et al. Stability and recoverability of liquid-gas interfaces on submerged hierarchically structured surfaces. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2020, 52(2): 451-461 (in Chinese))
    [3] Autumn K, Sitti M, Liang YCA, et al. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2002, 99(19): 12252-12256
    [4] 陈少华, 苏爱嘉. 生物黏附与仿生黏附力学的进展. 力学与实践, 2007, 29(4): 9-17

    (Chen Shaohua, Soh Aijia. Development of mechanics of bio-adhesion and biomimetic adhesion. Mechanics in Engineering, 2007, 29(4): 9-17 (in Chinese))
    [5] Autumn K, Liang YA, Hsieh ST, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature, 2000, 405(6787): 681-685
    [6] Gorb S, Scherge M. Biological microtribology: Anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2000, 267(1449): 1239-1244
    [7] Federle W, Riehle M, Curtis ASG, et al. An integrative study of insect adhesion: Mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2002, 42(6): 1100-1106
    [8] Spolenak R, Gorb S, Gao HJ, et al. Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2005, 461(2054): 305-319
    [9] Tian Y, Pesika N, Zeng HB, et al. Adhesion and friction in gecko toe attachment and detachment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(51): 19320-19325
    [10] Pesika NS, Tian Y, Zhao BX, et al. Peel-zone model of tape peeling based on the gecko adhesive system. Journal of Adhesion, 2007, 83(4): 383-401
    [11] Peng ZL, Chen SH, Soh AK. Peeling behavior of a bio-inspired nano-film on a substrate. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2010, 47(14-15): 1952-1960
    [12] Sauer RA. A finite element seta model for studying gecko adhesion. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2009, 12: 149-150
    [13] Bosia F, Colella S, Mattoli V, et al. Hierarchical multiple peeling simulations. Rsc Advances, 2014, 4(48): 25447-25452
    [14] Huber G, Mantz H, Spolenak R, et al. Evidence for capillarity contributions to gecko adhesion from single spatula nanomechanical measurements. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(45): 16293-16296
    [15] Federle W, Brainerd EL, McMahon TA, et al. Biomechanics of the movable pretarsal adhesive organ in ants and bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001, 98(11): 6215-6220
    [16] Chen SH, Gao HJ. Bio-inspired mechanics of reversible adhesion: Orientation-dependent adhesion strength for non-slipping adhesive contact with transversely isotropic elastic materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2007, 55(5): 1001-1015
    [17] Chen SH, Yan C, Soh AK. Adhesive behavior of two-dimensional power-law graded materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2009, 46(18-19): 3398-3404
    [18] Gao HJ, Wang X, Yao HM, et al. Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mechanics of Materials, 2005, 37(2-3): 275-285
    [19] Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(19): 10603-10606
    [20] Varenberg M, Pugno NM, Gorb SN. Spatulate structures in biological fibrillar adhesion. Soft Matter, 2010, 6(14): 3269-3272
    [21] Peng ZL, Wang C, Yang YZ, et al. Effect of relative humidity on the peeling behavior of a thin film on a rigid substrate. Physical Review E, 2016, 94(3): 032801
    [22] Peng ZL, Chen SH. Effects of surface roughness and film thickness on the adhesion of a bioinspired nanofilm. Physical Review E, 2011, 83(5): 051915
    [23] Peng ZL, Chen SH. Effect of pre-tension on the peeling behavior of a bio-inspired nano-film and a hierarchical adhesive structure. Applied Physics Letters, 2012, 101(16): 163702
    [24] Geim AK, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, et al. Microfabricated adhesive mimicking gecko foot-hair. Nature Materials, 2003, 2(7): 461-463
    [25] Glassmaker NJ, Jagota A, Hui CY. Adhesion enhancement in a biomimetic fibrillar interface. Acta Biomaterialia, 2005, 1(4): 367-375
    [26] Glassmaker NJ, Jagota A, Hui CY, et al. Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 1.Making contact. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2004, 1(1): 23-33
    [27] Peressadko A, Gorb SN. When less is more: Experimental evidence for tenacity enhancement by division of contact area. Journal of Adhesion, 2004, 80(4): 247-261
    [28] del Campo A, Greiner C, Arzt E. Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. Langmuir, 2007, 23(20): 10235-10243
    [29] Greiner C, Arzt E, del Campo A. Hierarchical gecko-like adhesives. Advanced Materials, 2009, 21(4): 479-482
    [30] Lee JH, Fearing RS, Komvopoulos K. Directional adhesion of gecko-inspired angled microfiber arrays. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 93(19): 191910
    [31] Jeong HE, Lee JK, Kwak MK, et al. Effect of leaning angle of gecko-inspired slanted polymer nanohairs on dry adhesion. Applied Physics Letters, 2010, 96(4): 043704
    [32] Murphy MP, Kim S, Sitti M. Enhanced adhesion by gecko-inspired hierarchical fibrillar adhesives. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2009, 1(4): 849-855
    [33] Li XJ, Peng ZL, Yang YZ, et al. Tunable adhesion of a bio-inspired micropillar arrayed surface actuated by a magnetic field. Journal of Applied Mechanics-Transactions of the ASME, 2019, 86(1): 011007
    [34] Parness A, Soto D, Esparza N, et al. A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2009, 6(41): 1223-1232
    [35] Tao DS, Gao X, Lu HY, et al. Controllable anisotropic dry adhesion in vacuum: Gecko inspired wedged surface fabricated with ultraprecision diamond cutting. Advanced Functional Materials, 2017, 27(22): 1606576
    [36] Tramsen HT, Gorb SN, Zhang H, et al. Inversion of friction anisotropy in a bioinspired asymmetrically structured surface. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2018, 15(138): 20170629
    [37] Jiang H, Hawkes EW, Fuller C, et al. A robotic device using gecko-inspired adhesives can grasp and manipulate large objects in microgravity. Science Robotics, 2017, 2(7): eaan4545
    [38] Reddy S, Arzt E, del Campo A. Bioinspired surfaces with switchable adhesion. Advanced Materials, 2007, 19(22): 3833-3837
    [39] Xue YG, Zhang YH, Feng X, et al. A theoretical model of reversible adhesion in shape memory surface relief structures and its application in transfer printing. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2014, 77: 27-42
    [40] Cao CY, Sun XY, Fang YH, et al. Theoretical model and design of electroadhesive pad with interdigitated electrodes. Materials & Design, 2016, 89: 485-491
    [41] Krahn J, Menon C. Electro-dry-adhesion. Langmuir, 2012, 28(12): 5438-5443
    [42] Drotlef DM, Blumler P, Papadopoulos P, et al. Magnetically actuated micropatterns for switchable wettability. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(11): 8702-8707
    [43] Gillies AG, Kwak J, Fearing RS. Controllable particle adhesion with a magnetically actuated synthetic gecko adhesive. Advanced Functional Materials, 2013, 23(26): 3256-3261
    [44] Boesel LF, Greiner C, Arzt E, et al. Gecko-inspired surfaces: A path to strong and reversible dry adhesives. Advanced Materials, 22(19): 2125-2137
    [45] Drechsler P, Federle W. Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: Influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance. Journal of Comparative Physiology A-Neuroethology Sensory Neural And Behavioral Physiology, 2006, 192: 1213-1222
    [46] Lees AD, Hardie J. The organs of adhesion in the aphid megoura viciae. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1988, 136: 209-228
    [47] Carlson A, Wang SD, Elvikis P, et al. Active, programmable elastomeric surfaces with tunable adhesion for deterministic assembly by transfer printing. Advanced Functional Materials, 2012, 22: 4476-4484
    [48] Dening K, Heepe L, Afferrante L, et al. Adhesion control by inflation: Implications from biology to artificial attachment device. Applied Physics A, 2014, 116: 567-573
    [49] Li LZ, Liu ZY, Zhou M, et al. Flexible adhesion control by modulating backing stiffness based on jamming of granular materials. Smart Materials & Structures, 2019, 28: 115023
    [50] Linghu CH, Wang CJ, Cen N, et al. Rapidly tunable and highly reversible bio-inspired dry adhesion for transfer printing in air and a vacuum. Soft Matter, 2019, 15: 30-37
    [51] Xie T, Xiao XC. Self-peeling reversible dry adhesive system. Chemistry of Materials, 2008, 20: 2866-2868
    [52] Spies GJ. The peeling test on redux-bonded joints: A theoretical analysis of the test devised by aero research limited. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 1953, 25(3): 64-70
    [53] 李炳奇, 张振宇, 李斌 等. 基于内聚力模型的高速水流聚脲基涂层剥离破坏模型研究. 力学学报, 2020, 52(5): 1538-1546

    (Li Bingqi, Zhang Zhenyu, Li Bin, et al. Study on debonding failure model of polyurea-based coating with high velocity water flow based on cohesive zone model. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2020, 52(5): 1538-1546 (in Chinese))
    [54] Chai Z, Liu M, Chen L, et al. Controllable directional deformation of micro-pillars actuated by a magnetic field. Soft Matter, 2019, 15: 8879-8885
    [55] Peng ZL, Chen SH. Effect of bending stiffness on the peeling behavior of an elastic thin film on a rigid substrate. Physical Review E, 2015, 91(4): 042401
    [56] Kendall K. Thin-film peeling-elastic term. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics, 1975, 8(13): 1449-1452
    [57] Needleman A. An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. International Journal of Fracture, 1990, 42(1): 21-40
    [58] Kamiyama H, Takaki H. A possible distribution of ion density in the iono-exosphere with a dipole magnetic field. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 1966, 18: 1-11
    [59] 王明勇, 郎志坚, 李国军. 方形磁体的空间磁场分布. 磁性材料及器件, 2001, 32: 17-20

    (Wang Mingyong, Lang Zhijian, Li Guojun. The spacial magnetic field distribution of square magnet. Journal of Magnetic Materials and Devies, 2001, 32: 17-20 (in Chinese))
    [60] Said MM, Yunas J, Pawinanto RE, et al. PDMS based electromagnetic actuator membrane with embedded magnetic particles in polymer composite. Sensors and Actuators A-Physical, 2016, 245: 85-96
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  795
  • HTML全文浏览量:  114
  • PDF下载量:  139
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-03-05
  • 刊出日期:  2021-06-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回