FFP在黏土中贯入过程的CFD模拟

刘君; 张雨勤

doi:10.6052/0459-1879-17-284

FFP在黏土中贯入过程的CFD模拟

doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-17-284

刘君^*, ,,
张雨勤

大连理工大学海岸与近海工程国家重点实验室,大连 116024

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（No.51479027, 51539008）资助.

详细信息

作者简介:
^通讯作者：刘君,教授,主要研究方向：海洋岩土工程,计算土力学. E-mail: junliu@dlut.edu.cn

通讯作者:
刘君

中图分类号: TU470.3;
计量
- 文章访问数: 1720
- HTML全文浏览量: 501
- PDF下载量: 381
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-08-21
- 刊出日期: 2018-01-18

CFD SIMULATION ON THE PENETRATION OF FFP INTO UNIFORM CLAY

Liu Jun^{*
, ,},
Zhang Yuqin

^* State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology Dalian, 116024, China

摘要

摘要: 圆锥静力触探法(Cone penetration test, CPT)广泛应用于土的抗剪强度测试中。在此基础上发展的自由落体式贯入仪(Free fall penetrometer, FFP),依靠自由下落获得的动能和自身重力势能贯入土中,不需要借助外部加载装置,提高其使用的便捷性。但在动力贯入过程中FFP与土的相互作用更为复杂,涉及到土体的率效应和拖曳阻力等的影响。因此,对FFP各项受力和相关参数的准确分析有助于提高其实用性以及测量的准确性。作者采用基于计算流体动力学(computational fluid dynamics, CFD)的分析软件ANSYS CFX 17.0模拟FFP在均质黏土中的贯入过程,借助动网格的大变形分析方法来模拟FFP贯入过程中的运动边界问题。提出了薄层单元法模拟FFP与土体的界面摩擦接触行为。在CFD模拟中,土体材料采用非牛顿流体来模拟,其剪切强度受土体切应变率的影响(即土体的率效应)。通过模拟贯入仪在黏土中以不同的速度贯入的过程,研究FFP的端部阻力和侧壁阻力与贯入速率、土体强度和密度、界面摩擦系数以及率效应参数之间的关系,建立了端部承载力系数、端部和侧壁率效应参数及拖曳系数的表达式,并提出了土体不排水抗剪强度的预测方法,为FFP测试数据的解析提供依据。
- 自由落体式贯入仪 /
- 土体率效应 /
- 拖曳阻力 /
- 承载力系数 /
- 土性测试 /
- 计算流体动力学
Abstract: The cone penetration test (CPT) has been widely used to measure the soil undrained shear strength. On the basis of CPT, the free fall penetrometer (FFP) is developed to improve the test efficiency, which penetrates into soil by its kinetic energy gained from free fall in the water/air column and potential energy. However, the soil-FFP interaction is rather complex, which refers to the shear strain rate effect and drag force. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the forces acting on the FFP accurately to improve its practicability and the accuracy of soil strength measurement. The FFP penetration procedure in uniform soils was simulated in the present study by using the commercial software ANSYS CFX 17.0, which is based on the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. The dynamic mesh approach was applied to simulate the moving boundary. The thin layer element method was proposed to simulate the FFP-soil interaction. In the CFD simulation, the soil was modeled as non-Newtonian fluid and the shear strain rate effect was considered. Different FFP velocities, soil strengths and densities, interface frictional coefficients and shear strain rate parameters were considered to investigate their effects on the bearing and sleeve resistances of FFP. The fitted formulas of the cone bearing capacity factor, the strain rate parameters and drag coefficients for the cone and sleeve were established based on the present numerical results. In addition, the process to estimate the undrained shear strength of clayed soils was put forward, which may be beneficial for analyzing the recorded data from FFP.
- FFP /
- rate effect /
- drag force /
- bearing capacity /
- soil testing /
- CFD

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

1	1 Freeman TJ, Murray CN, Francis TJG, et al. Modelling radioactive waste disposal by penetrator experiments in the abyssal Atlantic Ocean[J]. Nature, 1984, 310(5973): 130-133
2	Dayal U, Allen JH.Instrumented impact cone penetrometer.Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1973, 10(3): 397-409
3	Chow SH, O'Loughlin CD, White DJ, et al. An extended interpretation of the free-fall piezocone test in clay. Geotechnique, 2017(ahead of print )
4	O’Loughlin CD, Richardson MD, Randolph MF. Penetration of dynamically installed anchors in clay.Geotechnique, 2013, 63(11):909-919
5	Shelton JT.OMNI-Maxtrade anchor development and technology. Oceans IEEE, 2007: 1-10
6	Wang D, Bienen B, Nazem M, et al.Large deformation finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering. Computers and Geotechnics, 2015, 65(1): 104-114
7	Chow SH, Airey DW.Free-falling penetrometers: a laboratory investigation in clay.Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2013, 140(1): 201-214
8	Chow SH, O′Loughlin CD. Randolph MF. Soil strength estimation and pore pressure dissipation for free-fall piezocone in soft clay.Geotechnique, 2014, 64(10):817-827
9	Stark N, Radosavljevic B, Quinn B, et al.Application of portable free-fall penetrometer for geotechnical investigation of Arctic nearshore zone.Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2017, 54(1): 31-46
10	Araujo JBD, Machado RD, Junior CJDM.High Holding Power Torpedo Pile: Results for the First Long Term Application// International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 2004:417-421
11	韩聪聪,刘君. 板翼动力锚沉贯深度模型试验研究. 海洋工程,2016, 34(5):92-100
11	(Han Congcong, Liu Jun.Model tests on the penetration depth of gravity installed plate anchors.The Ocean Engineering, 2016, 34(5): 92-100 (in Chinese))
12	刘君,李明治,韩聪聪. 土体率效应对动力锚沉贯深度影响. 大连理工大学学报, 2017, 57(1): 68-77
12	(Liu Jun, Li Mingzhi, Han Congcong.Influence of soil strain-rate effect on embedment depth of dynamically installed anchors.Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2017, 57(1): 68-77 (in Chinese))
13	O’Loughlin CD, Richardson MD, Randolph MF. Centrifuge tests on dynamically installed anchors// International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Honolulu, 2009 (80238)
14	Einav I, Randolph M.Effect of strain rate on mobilised strength and thickness of curved shear bands. Geotechnique, 2006, 56(7): 501-504
15	Zhou M, Hossain MS, Hu Y, et al.Behaviour of ball penetrometer in uniform single-and double-layer clays.Geotechnique, 2013, 63(8): 682-694
16	Kim YH, Hossain MS, Wang D.Effect of strain rate and strain softening on embedment depth of a torpedo anchor in clay.Ocean Engineering, 2015, 108: 704-715
17	Liu H, Xu K, Zhao Y.Numerical investigation on the penetration of gravity installed anchors by a coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach.Applied Ocean Research, 2016, 60: 94-108
18	Øye I.Simulation of trajectories for a deep penetrating anchor.CFD Norway Report, 2000
19	Low HE, Lunne T, Andersen KH, et al.Estimation of intact and remoulded undrained shear strengths from penetration tests in soft clays.Geotechnique, 2010, 60(11): 843-859
20	Palix E, Wu H, Chan N, et al.Liwan 3-1: how deepwater sediments from South China Sea compare with Gulf of Guinea sediments. Offshore Technology Conference. 2013, OTC24010
21	Dayal U, Allen JH.The effect of penetration rate on the strength of remolded clay and sand samples.Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1975, 12(3): 336-348
22	Steiner A, Kopf AJ, L’Heureux JS, et al. In situ dynamic piezocone penetrometer tests in natural clayey soils—a reappraisal of strain-rate corrections.Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 51(3): 272-288
23	Kim YH, Hossain MS.Dynamic installation of OMNI-Max anchors in clay: numerical analysis.Geotechnique, 2015, 65(12): 1029-1037
24	Hawlader B, Dutta S, Fouzder A, et al. Penetration of steel catenary riser in soft clay seabed: finite-element and finite-volume methods. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2015, 15(6): 04015008-1-04015008-12
25	Hawlader B, Fouzder A, Dutta S. Numerical modeling of suction and trench formation at the touchdown zone of steel catenary riser. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2016, 16(1): 04015033-1-04015033-14
26	Zakeri A.Submarine debris flow impact on suspended (free-span) pipelines: Normal and longitudinal drag forces. Ocean Engineering, 2009, 36(6-7):489-499
27	Liu J, Tian J, Yi P.Impact forces of submarine landslides on offshore pipelines.Ocean Engineering, 2015, 95(95):116-127
28	Liu J, Zhang Y. Numerical simulation on the dynamic installation of the gravity installed plate anchor in clay: a fluid dynamic approach// ASME, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, 2017: OMAE2017-61570
29	Randolph MF, White DJ.Interaction forces between pipelines and submarine slides — A geotechnical viewpoint.Ocean Engineering, 2012, 48(7):32-37
30	Ma H, Zhou M, Hu Y, et al. Interpretation of layer boundaries and shear strengths for soft-stiff-soft clays using CPT data: LDFE analyses. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(1):04015055-1-04015055-12
31	Chow SH, Airey D.Free-falling penetrometers: a laboratory investigation in clay.Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2014, 140(1):201-214