EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊

基于PINN的典型金属材料宽应变率和宽温域冲击本构表征研究

STUDY ON IMPACT CONSTITUTIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF TYPICAL METALLIC MATERIALS WITH WIDE STRAIN RATE AND WIDE TEMPERATURE RANGE BASED ON PINN

  • 摘要: 材料的冲击力学性能与加载应变率、服役环境温度等密切相关, 传统Johnson-Cook(J-C)本构模型由于形式简单, 被广泛应用于金属材料的冲击本构表征, 但其在宽应变率和宽温域耦合工况下仍存在表征精度不足等问题. 本文提出了一种基于J-C本构模型约束与数据驱动方法融合的率温耦合冲击本构表征方法, 开展了7075-T6铝合金与65Mn高碳钢在室温(Room Temperature, RT) ~ 500 °C、10−3 ~ 103 s−1应变率范围内冲击力学性能实验, 构建了嵌入J-C本构的灰箱物理信息神经网络(Physics-Informed Neural Networks, PINN)本构模型, 并进行了PINN 与J-C、人工神经网络(Artificial Neural Networks, ANN)三类方法本构模型对金属材料应力预测精度的对比. 结果表明: PINN方法通过应变拆解为应变率硬化项、温度软化项、率温耦合项, 对输入特征重构后进行神经网络学习, 相较J-C本构和ANN方法, PINN模型的综合预测精度最优. 室温 ~ 500 °C和10−3 ~ 103 s−1应变率范围内两种金属材料所有工况下该PINN模型预测的最大相对均方根误差(Relative Root-Mean-Square Error, rRMSE)不超过10%, 7075-T6 铝合金和65Mn 高碳钢的平均rRMSE分别为 5.42%和 4.09%, 有效改善了 J-C 模型解耦假设带来的高应变率与高温工况下应力预测偏差较大及纯 ANN 模型对边缘工况预测可靠性不足的缺陷, 提供了一种更好的表征金属材料宽应变率、宽温域下冲击力学性能方法.

     

    Abstract: The impact mechanical properties of metallic materials are intrinsically correlated with applied loading strain rate and service temperature, which significantly govern their deformation behavior under dynamic conditions. Owing to its concise mathematical formulation, the classical Johnson-Cook (J-C) constitutive model has been extensively and successfully employed to describe the impact response of various metals. However, the inherent decoupling assumption in the J-C model, which independently considers strain hardening, strain-rate hardening, and thermal softening, frequently yields considerable deviations and insufficient characterization accuracy when materials are subjected to coupled wide-range strain rates (from quasi-static to high-strain-rate regimes) and broad temperature spans. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes a rate-temperature coupled impact constitutive characterization method that integrates J-C constitutive constraints with data-driven techniques. Systematic impact mechanical experiments were conducted on two representative alloys: 7075-T6 aluminum alloy and 65Mn high-carbon steel. The tests covered the temperature range from room temperature (RT) to 500 °C and the strain-rate range of 10−3 to 103 s−1. Based on the experimental data, a grey-box Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) constitutive model embedded with J-C model was established, and a comparative investigation was then performed among the PINN, the traditional J-C model, and a standard Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to evaluate their respective predictive capabilities in stress prediction for metallic materials. The results show that the PINN reconstructs input features by decomposing strain contributions into the strain-rate hardening term, the temperature softening term and rate-temperature coupling term for neural-network training. Compared with J-C and ANN models, the PINN achieves the best overall prediction accuracy. The maximum relative Root-Mean-Square Error (rRMSE) of the PINN model for all loading conditions of the two metallic materials within the temperature range from room temperature to 500 °C and strain-rate range of 10−3 to 103 s−1 does not exceed 10%, with an average rRMSE of 5.42% for 7075-T6 aluminum alloy and 4.09% for 65Mn high-carbon steel. The PINN model mitigates the substantial stress prediction deviations under high strain-rate and high-temperature conditions caused by the decoupling assumption of the J-C model, as well as the insufficient prediction reliability of pure ANN models for edge working conditions. This work provides an improved approach for characterizing impact mechanical behaviors of metals under wide strain-rate and temperature conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回