EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊

不同扰动对高速激波/转捩边界层干扰的影响

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT MODES ON SHOCK WAVE/TRANSITIONAL BOUNDARY LAYER INTERACTIONS IN A HIGH-SPEED FLOW

  • 摘要: 激波/转捩边界层干扰因其流动复杂性和严重的力热危害是高速飞行中备受关注的难题. 采用壁面解析的隐式大涡模拟计算了Ma = 6的激波/转捩边界层干扰过程, 考虑了两种不同的转捩机制, 分析了干扰系统的力热特性, 揭示了不稳定模态的演化规律及力热特性差异的原因. 当前算例结果表明: 激波/转捩边界层干扰会显著放大转捩初期的小扰动, 加速转捩过程, 但并未改变边界层转捩的主导机制, 动态模态分解的结果也支持了这一结论. 此外, 相比常规转捩, 干扰会显著抬高边界层摩擦阻力和热流峰值. 对于第二模态主导的激波/转捩边界层干扰, 涡结构和扰动演化分析表明转捩仍为基频共振机制主导, 但壁面摩擦阻力和热流因边界层再附和涡破碎过程经历两次增长, 达到更高的水平. 对于一对最优扰动主导的干扰过程, 转捩仍为第二模态斜波共振机制主导, 但由于干扰区转捩仍在弱非线性阶段, 下游涡破碎程度不完全, 壁面摩擦阻力和热流仅经历了一次增长, 整体水平也相对较小. 边界层的主导转捩机制及转捩程度是导致激波/转捩边界层干扰过程摩擦阻力和热流峰值差异的原因, 这一发现可为飞行器气动外形和热防护系统设计提供参考.

     

    Abstract: Shock wave/transitional boundary layer interaction, due to its flow complexity and severe mechanical/thermal damage, is a critical challenge in a high-speed flow. Wall-resolved implicit large eddy simulations were employed to investigate the shock/transitional boundary layer interaction at Ma = 6, considering two types of transition mechanisms. The characteristics of friction and heat flux are analyzed, differences of which between the two cases are scrutinized. Additionally, the evolution of the unstable modes is investigated to reveal the reasons for differences in aerodynamic and thermal characteristics. The current results demonstrate that the shock wave/transitional boundary layer interaction can significantly amplify the small-amplitude waves in the early stage of the boundary layer transition, thus accelerating the boundary layer transition. However, it does not alter the dominant transition mechanism. Results from dynamic mode decomposition also support this conclusion. Furthermore, compared to the natural transition, this interaction significantly enhances the peak of the skin friction and heat flux. For the shock wave/transitional boundary layer interaction dominated by the second modes, the analysis of the vortical structures and disturbance evolution indicates that the boundary layer transition is still driven by the fundamental resonance mechanism. Nevertheless, the skin friction coefficient and Stanton number undergo two distinct growth phases and reach a relatively higher level due to the boundary layer reattachment and vortex breakdown. For the interaction dominated by a pair of optimal modes, the boundary layer transition is still primarily governed by the oblique-mode resonance. In contrast, the boundary layer transition within the interaction is at the weakly nonlinear stage, and the vortices breakdown is not completely yet. Therefore, the skin friction and Stanton number only experience one-time growth, resulting in overall smaller peaks. The differences in peak skin friction and heat flux between these two cases are linked to the transition mechanism and state of the transitional boundary layer in the region of the interaction. These findings could act as useful guidelines for the design of aircraft aerodynamic configurations and thermal protection systems.

     

/

返回文章
返回