EI、Scopus 收录
中文核心期刊

真实分岔静脉下多种血液流变模型的溶栓治疗差异数值研究

NUMERICAL STUDY OF DIFFERENCES IN THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY WITH MULTIPLE BLOOD RHEOLOGY MODELS IN REAL BIFURCATED VEINS

  • 摘要: 静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)是一种常见的心血管疾病, 建立基于计算流体力学(CFD)的数值模型是开展血栓治疗研究的重要手段. 然而, 血液的流变模型众多, 多种血液流变模型之间存在显著的差异. 目前, 针对不同血液流变模型间的差异表现尚未得到充分研究. 本研究提出一种生物流体力学模型以用于静脉血栓治疗数值研究, 研究考虑静脉血流、血管结构以及药物传质间的作用耦合, 并将血液视为不同流变特性的7种流体、静脉瓣膜视为超弹性固体、血栓块视为多孔材料. 针对患者理想化和特异性的血管模型进行数值模拟, 综合分析静脉血栓的溶栓治疗数值结果. 结果表明, 患者特异性血管模型更接近实际血管情况, 其受分岔、弯曲等局部特征的影响, 流速变化明显、涡流强度和Pe较高、瓣膜位移值较大. 同时, 不同血液流变学模型的研究结果不同. 在患者特异性模型下, 牛顿模型的血液黏度较小, 流速和Pe较大, 物质传质更快, 溶栓表现较优; 非牛顿模型中Bingham流体表现差异最显著, 其血液黏度值较高, Pe较小, 溶栓表现较差. 本研究提倡采用患者实际血管模型、考虑血液实际流变特性进行静脉血栓数值研究, 以推动血栓治疗领域的数字医疗、智慧医疗技术进步.

     

    Abstract: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cardiovascular disease, and numerical modeling based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is an important tool for thrombus therapy research. However, there are numerous rheological models of blood, and significant differences exist between multiple blood rheology models. Currently, the performance of differences between different blood rheology models has not been adequately investigated. In this study, we propose a bio-hydrodynamic model for the numerical study of venous thrombosis therapy, which takes into account the coupling between venous blood flow, vascular structure, and drug mass transfer, and considers blood as a fluid with different rheological properties, venous valves as a hyperelastic solid, and thrombus clots as a porous material. Numerical simulations were performed for both idealized and patient-specific vascular models, and the numerical results of thrombolytic therapy for venous thrombosis were comprehensively analyzed. The results showed that the patient-specific vascular model was closer to the actual vascular situation, which was affected by local features such as bifurcation and bending, with obvious flow velocity changes, higher vortex intensity and Pe number, and larger values of valve displacement. At the same time, the results of different hemorheological models were different. Under the patient-specific model, the Newtonian model had lower blood viscosity, higher flow velocity and Pe number, faster material transfer, and better thrombolytic performance; the most significant difference in performance was seen in the non-Newtonian model with Bingham fluid, which had higher blood viscosity values, smaller Pe number, and poorer thrombolytic performance. This study advocates the use of actual patient vascular models and consideration of the actual rheological properties of blood for the numerical study of venous thrombosis, in order to promote the advancement of digital and intelligent medical technology in the field of thrombosis treatment.

     

/

返回文章
返回