基于PCE方法的翼型不确定性分析及稳健设计

赵轲; 高正红; 黄江涛; 李静

doi:10.6052/0459-1879-13-127

基于PCE方法的翼型不确定性分析及稳健设计

doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-13-127

1.
西北工业大学翼型叶栅空气动力国防科技重点实验室, 西安710072
2. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心, 绵阳621000

详细信息

作者简介:
赵轲，博士研究生，主要研究方向：飞行器气动设计.

中图分类号: V211.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 1066
- HTML全文浏览量: 39
- PDF下载量: 1357
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-04-23
- 修回日期: 2013-07-02
- 刊出日期: 2014-01-18

UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND ROBUST DESIGN OF AIRFOIL BASED ON POLYNOMIAL CHAOS TECHNIQUE

1.
National Key Laboratory of Aerodynamic Design and Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China
2. China Aerodynamics Research & Development Center, Mianyang 621000, China

摘要

摘要: 由于能够获得一个既经济又对参数变化不敏感的设计结果，稳健型设计在工程设计中备受关注. 不确定性分析是稳健型设计的关键. 因此研究了基于混沌多项式的不确定性分析方法，并将其与CFD 方法结合，对计算空气动力学设计中的不确定性影响进行了量化分析. 首先以RAE2822 翼型为算例，对其跨音速马赫数不确定影响进行了分析，研究了多项式阶次对计算的影响，分析了平均流场和方差. 接着结合超临界翼型的马赫数稳健型设计验证了混沌多项式方法在稳健型设计中的有效性. 优化结果表明，稳健型优化后的翼型阻力系数明显降低，同时对于马赫数的敏感性显著减小. 通过分析表明混沌多项式方法能够大幅提高稳健型优化设计效率，能很好地应用于气动稳定性设计.
- 稳健型设计 /
- NSGA-II /
- 混沌多项式 /
- 埃尔米特多项式 /
- 不确定性分析
Abstract: Robust design optimization has gained increasing concern in the engineering design process because it can provide an economical design that is insensitive to variations in the input variables without eliminating their causes. The key of robust design is uncertainty analysis. So in this paper the uncertainty analysis based on polynomial chaos was investigated and combined with CFD method to quantify the uncertainties in computational aerodynamic design. The transonic flow around RAE2822 airfoil is studied to test the presented method and analyze the effect of the polynomial order to the precision of the aerodynamic characteristic. The robust design of a supercritical airfoil based on the uncertainty of Mach number was conducted to validate the PCE method. It is shown by the optimization result that the drag coefficient was decreased at the design point while the sensitivity of the drag coefficient about the Mach number was weakened. It is proved that the PCE method can improve the efficiency of robust design and is a good choice for aerodynamic robust design.
- robust design /
- NSGAII /
- polynomial chaos /
- Hermite polynomials /
- uncertainty quantification

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

Li W, Huyse L, Padula S. Robust airfoil optimization to achieve consistent drag reduction over a Mach range. ICASE Report No. 2001-22 , 2001

陈立周. 稳健设计. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2000. 5(Cheng Lizhou. Robust Design. Beijing: Mechanical Industry Press, 2000. 5 (in Chinese))

Zhong XP,Ding JF, Li WJ, et al. Robust airfoil optimization with multi-objective estimationof distribution algorithm. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2008, 21(4): 289-295

Anile AM, Spinella S, Rinaudo S. Stochastic response surface method and tolerance analysis in microelectronics, COMPEL. The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 2003, 22(2): 314-327

Tatang MA, Pan W, Prinn RG, et al. An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997, 102(D18): 21925-21932

Wiener N. The homogeneous chaos. American Journal of Mathematics, 1938, 60: 897-936

Ghanem R, Spanos P. Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991

Ghanem RG. Ingredients for a general purpose stochastic finite element formulation. Computational Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering, 1999, 168: 19-34

Mathelin L, Hussaini MY, Zang TZ, et al. Uncertainty propagation for turbulent, compressible nozzle flow using stochastic methods. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(8): 1669-1676

Xiu D, Karniadakis GE. Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos. Journal of Computational Physics, 2003, 187(1): 137-167

Debusschere BJ, Najm HN, Pebay PP, et al. Numerical challenges in the use of polynomial chaos representations for stochastic processes. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2004, 26(2): 698-719

Reagan M, Najm HN, Ghanem RG, et al. Uncertainty quantification in reacting flow simulationsthrough non-intrusive spectral projection. Combustion and Flame, 2003, 132: 545-555

Mathelin L, Hussaini MY, Zang TZ. Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations. Numerical Algorithms, 2005, 38(1): 209-236

Wataru Y. Stochastic drag analysis via polynomial chaos uncertainty quantification. AIAA 2013-0962, 2013

王晓东, 康顺. 多项式混沌方法在随机方腔流动模拟中的应用. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2011, 41(6): 790-798 (Wang Xiaodong, Kang Shun. Application of polynomial chaos on numerical simulation of stochastic cavity flow. Sci China Tech Sci, 2011, 41(6): 790-798 (in Chinese))

Mathelin L, Hussaini MY, Zang TZ. Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations. Numerical Algorithms, 2005, 38(1): 209-236

Eldred MS, Burkardt J. Comparison of non-intrusive polynomial chaos and stochastic collocation methods for uncertainty quantification. AIAA Paper 2009-0976, 2009

Cameron RH, Martin WT. The orthogonal development of non-linear functionals in series of fourier-hermite functionals. Annals of Mathematics, 1947, 48(2): 385-392

Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 181-197

Jacob CH, William AC. A parametric approach to supercritical airfoil design optimization. AIAA Paper 2009-6950, 2009

Ceze M. A study of the CST Parameterization Characteristics. AIAA Paper 2009-3767, 2009

Kulfan BM. Universal parametric geometry representation method. Journal of Aircraft, 2008, 45(1): 142-158

李静,高正红,黄江涛等. 基于CST参数化方法气动优化设计研究. 空气动力学学报, 2012, 30(4): 443-449 (Li Jing, Gao Zhenghong, Huang Jiangtao, et al. Aerodynamic optimization system based on CST technique. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2012, 30(4): 443-449 (in Chinese))

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计